A three-item scale measuring the degree to which a consumer believes that retailers offering low price guarantees do so primarily to protect buyers against price fluctuations and offer refunds when better prices are found elsewhere, rather than to signal genuine lowest-price status. This protection-focus framing positions the guarantee as a defensive consumer safeguard — a post-purchase insurance mechanism — rather than a credible market signal of price competitiveness.
7-point Likert
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Multiple reliability estimates: α = .75 (Study 1), α = .87 (Study 2), α = .86 (Study 3A), and α = .90 (retailer-specific version) — Dutta, Biswas & Grewal (2011). The general version achieved acceptable reliability in Studies 2 and 3A; the retailer-specific adaptation is the strongest. VALIDITY: Factor analyses across studies confirmed clean separation between the protection-focus and information-focus items. NOTE: Available in a general version and a retailer-specific version (replace generic retailer references with the specific retailer's name). Companion to the information-focus version of the scale (ALPGI). Both scales should ideally be administered together when the goal is to assess which interpretation of the guarantee mechanism is dominant for a given consumer segment.
Dutta, Sujay, Abhijit Biswas, and Dhruv Grewal (2011). Regret from postpurchase discovery of lower market prices: Do price refunds help? Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 124–138.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales