A three-item scale assessing the degree to which a consumer believes that retailers who offer low price guarantees do so primarily to signal that they genuinely hold the lowest prices in the market. This information-focus framing conceptualises the guarantee as a truthful signal of price competitiveness rather than a defensive refund mechanism. The scale is paired with a companion protection-focus version that captures an alternative consumer belief about the purpose of price guarantees.
7-point Likert
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
RELIABILITY CAUTION: Alpha estimates for the general version across studies were .73 (Study 1), .75 (Study 2), and .72 (Study 3A) — all below the .80 threshold. A retailer-specific version reached α = .84 in one study. This entry retains the scale on the basis of the .84 estimate from the adapted version, but researchers should be aware that reliability for the general wording has been consistently below criterion across independent studies and revalidation is recommended. VALIDITY: Factor analyses across studies showed the information-focus and protection-focus items separated cleanly into two factors. NOTE: A general version and a retailer-specific version exist (replace 'a retailer' with the specific retailer's name). The companion scale, Attitude Toward a Low Price Guarantee (Protection Focus) — ALPGP — measures an alternative interpretation of the same guarantee mechanism.
Dutta, Sujay, Abhijit Biswas, and Dhruv Grewal (2011). Regret from postpurchase discovery of lower market prices: Do price refunds help? Journal of Marketing, 75(6), 124–138.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales