Four-item reflective scale measuring the extent to which an organisation possesses structured and organised knowledge about its market. Two items capture absolute knowledge level (knowing value drivers, thoroughness of market development knowledge); two items assess diagnostic capability (identifying affected areas and causes when marketing plan deviations occur). Used as a mediator between marketing performance measurement system comprehensiveness and firm performance.
7-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree); rated by marketing managers
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Coefficient alpha not separately reported in the paper; AVE = .69 (reported in Table 3), implying composite reliability ≈ .90. Rated by marketing managers (separate from MPMS measures rated by management accounting executives—dyadic design). Market knowledge mediated the CMPMS–firm performance relationship. Adapted from Albers (1998) and Moorman and Miner (1997).
Homburg, C., Artz, M., & Wieseke, J. (2012). Marketing performance measurement systems: Does comprehensiveness really improve performance? Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 56–77.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales