Three-item scale measuring the extent to which a marketing performance measurement system provides explicit information about cause-and-effect relationships within the marketing value chain—whether it shows how activities and results connect, whether measures build upon each other, and whether causal relationships are visible. The most consistently effective sub-component of CMPMS for improving market knowledge across contingency conditions.
7-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree); rated by management accounting executives
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Composite reliability = .84; AVE = .64. Rated by management accounting executives in a dyadic design. MPMS-CER showed the strongest and most consistent associations with market knowledge across all three contingency moderators. For marketing alignment, effects were strongest at high marketing complexity and low market dynamism. Adapted from Bisbe, Batista-Foguet, and Chenhall (2007), Chenhall (2005), Hall (2008).
Homburg, C., Artz, M., & Wieseke, J. (2012). Marketing performance measurement systems: Does comprehensiveness really improve performance? Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 56–77.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales