Three items capture how customers assess the quality of care expressed by frontline service employees -- whether they are likely to be friendly, capable of providing knowledgeable advice, and consistent in treating all customers equally. Although loosely anchored in the empathy dimension of SERVQUAL, the items reflect observable employee conduct rather than affective perspective-taking. The scale is particularly suited to service contexts in which frontline aesthetic presentation and employee uniformity are studied alongside service delivery quality.
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Items were developed for use in studies on aesthetic labor in service settings and were loosely inspired by the empathy dimension of Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (1988), though no items are shared with the original SERVQUAL empathy subscale. The scale should not be interpreted as a direct measure of empathic concern -- item content emphasizes friendliness, competence, and equal treatment rather than individualised attention or emotional attunement. Construct reliabilities and AVEs differ across studies: the five-point Study 1 version showed stronger convergent validity (AVE = .71) than the seven-point Study 2 version (AVE = .53), and researchers should be attentive to format effects when comparing results across studies. Reliability reported as composite reliability (CR/ω) rather than Cronbach's α; the value entered in the alpha field reflects CR. CR and omega are computed from the same formula using CFA factor loadings and are treated as equivalent here. Source: Pounders, Babin & Close (2015), Table 1.
Pounders, K. R., Babin, B. J., & Close, A. G. (2015). All the same to me: Outcomes of aesthetic labor performed by frontline service providers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(6), 670-693.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales