Measures two distinct moral emotions in consumer contexts: guilt (feeling bad about a specific behaviour — e.g., overspending, unhealthy eating, impulse buying) and shame (feeling bad about oneself as a consumer — e.g., feeling like a bad person for one's consumption choices). Guilt and shame have different consequences — guilt motivates corrective behaviour while shame motivates avoidance and disengagement.
Likert (1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree)
Consumer Guilt — feeling responsible for a transgression related to consumption (Likert 1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree)
Consumer Shame — feeling of personal inadequacy or public exposure related to consumption
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Two subscale scores. Guilt motivates return, complaint, and corrective purchase behaviour; shame motivates avoidance, brand switching, and disengagement. Particularly relevant in research on indulgent consumption, unhealthy food choices, luxury guilt, and ethical consumption failures. Guilt appeals in advertising are effective up to a point — excessive guilt reduces ad effectiveness.
Quimby, J.L., & Rapp, J.M. (2018). Consumer guilt: Scale development and preliminary findings. Journal of Business Research, 107, 236–247.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales