Moral Appropriateness of Continuing the Emotion

Perceived Moral Rightness of Sustaining a Just-Experienced Emotion
4 items 2023 α 0.91 (Study 1); .90 or above for context-specific variations in other studies Free Lin, S. C., Reich, T., & Kreps, T. A.

What it measures

This scale measures how morally appropriate a person believes it would be to keep feeling an emotion they have just experienced. Lin, Reich, and Kreps (2023) developed it for research on why people choose to sustain negative emotions after exposure to human suffering, using the version shown here in Study 1 and context-specific variations in later studies. The items are written generically so the stimulus can be inserted in the blank.

Response format

7-point bipolar (item-specific anchors, e.g., extremely inappropriate / extremely appropriate)

Scale items

Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.

Usage notes & scoring

Alpha was .91 in Study 1 (Lin, Reich, and Kreps 2023, p. 548); variations used in the other studies all had alphas of .90 or above. Validity was not discussed. Each item has its own bipolar anchors, shown in brackets. The blank should name the stimulus that elicited the emotion (e.g., a news story or video). The scale appears to have been created by the authors.

Citation

Lin, Stephanie C., Taly Reich, and Tamar A. Kreps (2023), "Feeling Good or Feeling Right: Sustaining Negative Emotion After Exposure to Human Suffering," Journal of Marketing Research, 60 (3), 543-563.

Find on Google Scholar

Keywords

#moralemotions#emotionregulation#moralappropriateness#negativeemotion#humansuffering#prosocial

More Emotion & Affect scales

Browse all 51 Emotion & Affect scales →
View & search this scale interactively →

Free access to 2491+ psychometric scales at PsychScales