The most widely cited service quality measure. The gap model computes service quality as the difference between consumer expectations and perceptions of actual service delivery across five dimensions. Foundational to services marketing research and practice. Despite methodological debate, it remains the dominant framework for measuring service quality.
Two-section Likert (1–7): expectations section and perceptions section; gap score = perception minus expectation per item
Tangibles — physical facilities, equipment, and appearance of personnel (Likert 1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree)
Reliability — ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately
Responsiveness — willingness to help customers and provide prompt service
Assurance — knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to inspire trust
Empathy — caring, individualised attention the firm provides its customers
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Score each of the 22 items in both expectation and perception sections; service quality = mean of (P – E) gap scores per dimension. Negative gap = quality shortfall. Widely critiqued for double-administration burden; SERVPERF (perceptions only) is a psychometrically superior alternative for many contexts.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales