This scale measures how consequential a user believes the tasks they perform with an artificial intelligence assistant (AIA), such as Amazon's Alexa or Apple's Siri, to be, across personal organization, information-seeking, device management, and purchase-related task categories. Uysal, Alavi, and Bezençon (2022) used it in Study 1 (n = 238) with U.K. residents who were current AIA users.
7-point bipolar (consequential / inconsequential)
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Alpha was .80 (Uysal, Alavi, and Bezençon 2022, p. 1162), at the site's inclusion threshold. A CFA was conducted, with the authors stating conventional convergent and discriminant validity tests were performed; the AVE for the scale was reported at approximately .50, near the low end of acceptable convergent validity, and further detail was limited. Although the authors described the scale as "adapted" from Castelo, Bos, and Lehmann (2019), that source did not contain a summated scale for this construct; Uysal, Alavi, and Bezençon (2022) appear to have created the scale by drawing on a one-item measure and related concepts in that article.
Uysal, Ertugrul, Sascha Alavi, and Valery Bezençon (2022), "Trojan Horse or Useful Helper? A Relationship Perspective on Artificial Intelligence Assistants with Humanlike Features," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50 (6), 1153-1175.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales