Measures the degree to which individuals define themselves as autonomous and separate from others (independent self-construal) versus as fundamentally connected to and defined by relationships with others (interdependent self-construal). Based on Markus & Kitayama's (1991) foundational cross-cultural psychology framework. Independent self-construal is more prevalent in Western/individualist cultures; interdependent self-construal is more prevalent in East Asian/collectivist cultures. In consumer research, self-construal predicts responses to individualist vs. collectivist advertising appeals, susceptibility to social influence, sensitivity to social risk in purchase decisions, brand choice in social contexts, and word-of-mouth behaviour. Widely used to capture within-culture variation that country-level cultural values indices miss.
Likert (1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree)
Independent Self-Construal — defining self as autonomous, separate from others (Likert 1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree)
Interdependent Self-Construal — defining self through relationships and group membership (Likert 1–7)
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Two subscale scores. The two dimensions are largely independent — high independent and high interdependent scores are possible (bicultural individuals). Self-construal can be temporarily primed using exposure to independent or interdependent pronouns (I/me vs. we/us), making it useful in experimental designs. Widely used as an individual-level alternative to Hofstede's country-level individualism-collectivism scores.
Singelis, T.M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales