The CCS is the most comprehensive validated measure of consumer coping with stressful consumption episodes — the cognitive and behavioural responses consumers employ when encountering problems, failures, or threats in consumption contexts (e.g., service failures, product malfunctions, complaint situations, post-purchase regret, financial stress). Duhachek (2005) developed the CCS by adapting the clinical stress and coping literature (particularly Lazarus & Folkman's, 1984, transactional model) to consumer behaviour contexts, conducting grounded theory interviews with consumers about how they responded to stressful consumption experiences, followed by large-scale quantitative validation. The CCS organises coping responses into three higher-order factors — Approach: Problem-Focused Coping, Approach: Emotion-Focused Coping, and Avoidance Coping — each comprising three distinct lower-order coping strategies. Problem-Focused Coping encompasses Planful Problem Solving (developing systematic strategies to address the source of stress), Instrumental Support Seeking (seeking information, advice, or resources from others), and Positive Reappraisal (reframing the stressful situation positively). Emotion-Focused Coping encompasses Self-Blame (attributing the problem to one's own failings), Social Comparison (comparing one's situation to worse-off others), and Emotional Support Seeking (seeking emotional comfort from others). Avoidance Coping encompasses Distancing (detaching cognitively from the stressful situation), Escape-Avoidance (wishful thinking and avoiding the problem), and Denial (refusing to acknowledge the reality of the problem). The CCS has been used to understand how consumers respond to service failures, financial difficulties, product-related anxiety, and marketplace threats.
Duhachek, A. (2005). Coping: A multidimensional, hierarchical framework of responses to stressful consumption episodes. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 41–53.
Free access to 2023+ psychometric scales at PsychScales