Destination Authenticity Scale

DAS-APerceived Destination Authenticity
12 items 1999 α 0.80–0.90 Free Wang, N.

What it measures

Measures three forms of authenticity in tourism: object-based (genuineness of cultural/historical objects), intrapersonal existential (feeling true to oneself during the experience), and interpersonal existential (authentic social connections during travel). Wang's existential authenticity framework shifts focus from authentic objects to authentic self-experiences.

Response format

Likert (1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree)

Scale items

Object-Based Authenticity — perceived genuineness of tangible destination elements (Likert 1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree)

Existential Authenticity — self-discovery and heightened personal experiences

Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.

Usage notes & scoring

Three subscale scores. Existential authenticity is increasingly important as tourists seek immersive, transformative experiences over staged performances. High existential authenticity predicts overall trip meaningfulness and WOM.

Recommended companion scales

Memorable Tourist ExperienceDestination SatisfactionPlace Attachment

Citation

Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349–370.

Find on Google Scholar

Keywords

#authenticity#culturaltourism#heritagetourism#experientialtourism#self-expression#genuine#stagedauthenticity
View & search this scale interactively →

Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales