Operationalises Ajzen's (1991) Theory of Planned Behaviour for vacation destination selection. Attitude captures evaluative beliefs about visiting the destination (good/bad, wise/foolish, pleasant/unpleasant). Subjective norm captures perceived social pressure from important referents to visit or not visit. Perceived behavioural control (PBC) captures perceived ease or difficulty of making the trip. Behavioural intention captures likelihood of visiting in a specified timeframe. The TPB framework consistently outperforms simpler attitude-only models, particularly when PBC is salient — as in high-cost, long-haul, or high-risk destination choices.
Likert (1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree) for norm and PBC; semantic differential (1–7 bipolar pairs) for attitude
Attitude — overall evaluation of visiting the destination (Likert 1–7, strongly disagree to strongly agree / semantic differential)
Subjective Norm — perceived social pressure to visit
Perceived Behavioural Control — ease or difficulty of visiting
Behavioural Intention — intention to visit the destination
Full scale items shown. Always cite the original source when using this scale in research.
Four subscale scores. Attitude is consistently the strongest predictor of intention across cultural contexts; subjective norm effects are stronger in high-collectivism samples. Past travel experience to the destination should be included as a covariate — it acts as a proxy for actual behavioural control. TPB is most valuable for predicting first-time visits and high-involvement destination decisions.
Lam, T., & Hsu, C.H.C. (2006). Predicting behavioral intention of choosing a travel destination. Tourism Management, 27(4), 589–599.
Free access to 2455+ psychometric scales at PsychScales